DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

One-line: Official GA of DeepSeek-V4-Flash (supersedes the preview) — a coding-agent release with massive agentic gains over the preview (Terminal Bench 2.1 61.8 → 82.7, DeepSWE 7.3 → 54.4) at ~13B active params, MIT license, ships FP8/FP4-quantized. ⚠ large (server-class).

Coding benchmarks

BenchmarkScoreSource
HumanEval—not published for this checkpoint
HumanEval+—not published
MBPP—not published
LiveCodeBench—not published for this checkpoint
Aider polyglot—not published
SWE-bench Verified—not published for this checkpoint (lab used DeepSWE/Terminal-Bench instead)
SWE-bench Multilingual—not published
Terminal Bench 2.182.7lab (DeepSeek Harness, max effort)
NL2Repo54.2lab (DeepSeek Harness, max effort)
Cybergym76.7lab (DeepSeek Harness, max effort)
DeepSWE54.4lab (DeepSeek Harness, max effort)
DSBench-FullStack †68.7lab (internal set)
DSBench-Hard †59.6lab (internal set)

All numbers lab-reported from the model card (DeepSeek Harness minimal mode, max reasoning effort, temp 1.0 / top_p 0.95). † internal full-stack test sets. No independent third-party evals published yet (released 2026-07-31).

Agentic / tool-use benchmarks

BenchmarkScoreSource
BFCL—not published
τ-Bench—not published
ToolACE—not published
GAIA—not published
Toolathlon-Verified70.3lab
Agents’ Last Exam25.2lab
AutomationBench Public25.1lab

Toolathlon-Verified 70.3 vs GLM-5.2’s 59.9; Agents’ Last Exam 25.2 vs GLM-5.2 23.8. The card’s comparison set is GLM-5.2 and Opus-4.8 — 0731 is within ~2-3 points of Opus-4.8 on most agentic rows.

Reasoning (context only)

BenchmarkScoreSource
MMLU / MMLU-Pro—not published for this checkpoint
GPQA Diamond—not published
MATH—not published
AIME 2025—not published

Efficiency

  • Active params: ~13B (per token — top-6 of 256 routed + 1 shared; Flash family, same structure as DeepSeek-V4-Flash-DSpark)
  • Total params: ~284B (disk-resident; 43 layers, hidden 4096, MLA-style attention with head_dim 512 + DSpark speculative draft on layers 40-42)
  • Context length: 1,048,576 tokens (1M) via YaRN (base 64K); max output recommended 384K at high/max effort
  • VRAM (fp16 rough): ~570 GB full precision — NOT realistic. Official distribution is FP8 (e4m3) weights + FP4 experts ≈ 160-200 GB on disk; vLLM recipe targets a 4×GB300 node with expert parallel. ⚠ large — datacenter-class, not a local workstation model.

What makes it notable

DeepSeek’s GA of V4-Flash, released 2026-07-31 and explicitly optimized for coding agents, fixes the preview’s agentic weakness: Terminal Bench 2.1 jumps 61.8 → 82.7, DeepSWE 7.3 → 54.4, Cybergym 38.7 → 76.7, Toolathlon 49.7 → 70.3. It beats GLM-5.2 on every row in the card’s comparison table (TB2.1 82.7 vs 81.0, DeepSWE 54.4 vs 46.2, Toolathlon 70.3 vs 59.9) and trails Opus-4.8 by only ~2-3 points on most agentic benchmarks — at a fraction of the active params (13B vs 1.6T-class peers). MIT license, 1M context, DSpark speculative decoding built into the checkpoint. Same caveat as the rest of the V4 family: FP8/FP4 official quant + custom encoding scripts mean stock vLLM/SGLang support is still settling; budget multi-GPU (4×GB300).

See also